There is a module for that zeigt wie man seine Views unter Versions Kontrolle halten kann.

Bis zum 2. März kann man die Online-Petition zur Aufhebung des elektronischen Entgeltnachweises ELENA mitzeichnen.

Leider akzeptiert das blödsinnige System mein Passwort nicht mehr. Jedes mal wenn ich mir eine Online-Petition ansehe habe ich das Gefühl dass da wird absichtlich ein möglichst mieses System verwendet damit keiner mitmacht.

Mal wieder ein spannendes Projekt von der Filament Group: EnhanceJS.

EnhanceJS is a new JavaScript framework (a single 2.5kb JavaScript file once minified/gzipped) that that automates a series of browser tests to ensure that advanced CSS and JavaScript features will render properly before they’re loaded to the page, enabling you to build advanced, modern websites without introducing accessibility problems for people on browsers that aren’t capable of supporting all advanced features. It’s designed to be easily integrated into a standard progressive enhancement workflow: just construct the page using standard, functional HTML, and reference any advanced CSS and JavaScript files using EnhanceJS to ensure they’re only delivered to browsers capable of understanding them.

Im Einsatz könnte das in etwa so aussehen:

<script type="text/javascript" src="enhance.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
	enhance({
		loadStyles: [
			'css/enhancements.css'
		],
		loadScripts: [
			'js/jquery.min.js',
			'js/enhancements.js'
		]
	});
</script>

Audio und Video Player gibt es zwar wie Sand am Meer, aber da man immer mal einen braucht hier der Hinweis auf NonverBlaster:hover.

The NonverBlaster:hover is a mod of my Flash-based Video-Player »NonverBlaster«. It was developed for the IT-news portal golem.de.

Eine gute Nachricht für WebdesignerInnen:

(FontShop is) selling web licenses to hundreds of fonts from their FontFont library in WOFF and EOT format. And, we’re excited to announce that if you buy any of these fonts from FontShop, you can use it with your Typekit account.

Bruce Schneier über CCTV

If universal surveillance were the answer, lots of us would have moved to the former East Germany. If surveillance cameras were the answer, camera-happy London, with something like 500,000 of them at a cost of $700 million, would be the safest city on the planet.

We didn’t, and it isn’t, because surveillance and surveillance cameras don’t make us safer. The money spent on cameras in London, and in cities across America, could be much better spent on actual policing.